Social Service Review
Founded in 1927, Social Service Review (SSR) is devoted to the publication of thought provoking, original research on pressing social issues and promising social work practices and social welfare policies. Articles in SSR analyze issues from the vantage points of a broad spectrum of disciplines, theories, and methodological traditions, at the individual, family, community, organizational, and societal levels.
Coverage: 1927-2015 (Vol. 1, No. 1 - Vol. 89, No. 3)
The "moving wall" represents the time period between the last issue available in JSTOR and the most recently published issue of a journal. Moving walls are generally represented in years. In rare instances, a publisher has elected to have a "zero" moving wall, so their current issues are available in JSTOR shortly after publication.
Note: In calculating the moving wall, the current year is not counted.
For example, if the current year is 2008 and a journal has a 5 year moving wall, articles from the year 2002 are available.
- Terms Related to the Moving Wall
- Fixed walls: Journals with no new volumes being added to the archive.
- Absorbed: Journals that are combined with another title.
- Complete: Journals that are no longer published or that have been combined with another title.
Subjects: Social Sciences, Social Work, Public Policy & Administration
Collections: Arts & Sciences VI Collection
Cronbach, L.J. 1963. Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record, 64 (8), 672–683.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D.F., and Delamont, S. 1974. Classroom research: A cautionary tale. Research in Education, 11 (May), 1–16.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. et al. (eds.). 1977. Beyond the numbers game. London: MacMillan Education.Google Scholar
Hastings, J.T. 1966. Curriculum evaluation: The why of the outcomes. Journal of Educational Measurement, 3 (1), 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, E.R. 1972. The conscience of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 72 (3), 405–414.Google Scholar
MacDonald, B. 1971. The evaluation of the Humanities Curriculum Project: A holistic approach. Theory into Practice, 10 (3), 163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, B. 1973. Humanities curriculum project. In Evaluation in curriculum devel opment: Twelve case studies (Schools Council Research Studies). Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
Parlett, M.R. 1972. Evaluating innovations in teaching. In H.J. Butcher and E. Rudd (eds.), Contemporary problems in research in higher education. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Parlett, M.R., and Hamilton, D. 1977. Evaluation in illumination: A new approach to the study of innovative programmes.” In D. Hamilton et al. (eds.), Beyond the numbers game. London: MacMillan Education.Google Scholar
Scriven, M. 1967. The methodology of evaluation. In R.W. Tyler, R.M. Gagne, and M. Scriven, Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (American Educational Research Association Monograph on Curriculum Evaluation no. 1 ). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Stake, R.E. 1974. Responsive evaluation. New Trends in Evaluation, 35 (January), 41–73 ( Institute of Education, University of Goteborg ).Google Scholar
Stufflebeam, D.L., and Guba, E. 1968. Evaluation: The process of stimulating, aiding and abetting insightful action. Address to the Second National Symposium for Professors of Educational Research, 21 November, at Boulder, Colorado. Evaluation Center, College of Education, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Stufflebeam, D.L., et al. (Phi Delta Kappa National Study Committee on Evaluation). 1971. Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca, I11.: Peacock.Google Scholar
Suchman, E. A. 1967. Evaluative research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Tawney, David (ed). 1976. Curriculum evaluation today. London: MacMillan Education.Google Scholar