Downloading Music. Persuasive Essay That Agrees Downloading Music Is Right And Shouldn't Be Restricted
In 1999, an 18-year-old college drop out named Shawn Fanning invented the program that was Napster. Almost instantaneously upon its release its popularity grew, making the small building located in Redwood City, California an instant controversial interest across America. Napster was an Internet based program that allowed users share and download media files for free. Since Napster didn't hold the files and they originally belonged to the users, it was difficult for the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) to file a case against them. Eventually, at Napster's peak in 2001, it was shut down. Nonetheless, new programs rose to take Napster's place. There are two that still exist and are the most popular, Morpheus and Kazaa, which are used most frequently by the youth of America. Since 2003, the RIAA has found a new way to end file sharing: suing any individual found with an excessive amount of illegal music and charged at an average of $12,500 to $17,000. The prices these kids have to pay are ridiculous and the fact that they are being sued in the first place is an outrage. Because they download music, innocent parents must pay the price. Downloading music for free is easy and convenient and may encourage the user to buy a full album.
The main issue is that sharing music is right. Most of the file sharers are middle class teenagers who would rather listen to that one song instead of buy the whole album. Many teenagers do not have a monthly income to buy albums with that one song they want. Some feel that buying the whole album isn't worth the money as the prices have recently increased within the past few months. Increased album prices only encourage file sharers to share more music more often than before. Even before file sharing programs appeared, people could easily record music from their CDs onto their tapes and give them to friends so they could duplicate the songs as well. But now, file sharing has revolutionized music, so they might as well get used to it.
Yet the RIAA protests that since programs like Napster had appeared, CD sales had gone down. Still they had billions...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%
Case: Downloading Music Essay699 words - 3 pages PAGE Case: Downloading MusicIntroductionThe Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is the traffic group that represents the best recording industry in U.S. Its mission is to promote a business and legal...
Is Music Downloading A Good Idea?967 words - 4 pages Nowadays, most people can search for what they want through the Internet. The Internet has become powerful because it allows people to share or copy music, pictures, movies, software and different formats of documents. We know the Internet allows sharing of all kinds of information but that doesn’t mean it should be unrestricted. Through the Internet, people can find many materials and download them as references or for general interest, and some...
Illegal Downloading of Music and Intellectual Property1365 words - 5 pages Before iPhones, tablets and laptops people had to buy hard copies as in CDs, records and even vinyl’s. According to Cornell University the average cost for a hard copy cd is $13.99 if bought a week after release date on average if bought on the release date it is $9.99. Before the internet the arrangement for the music industry was that there were only 6 main labels for 60 years were the heads for all the distribution and promoting of recorded...
The Controversy Over Music Downloading2325 words - 9 pages The Controversy Over Music Downloading Imagine you are driving down the road, listening to the radio, and a new song begins to play that catches your attention. You decide, after listening to this song, that you enjoy it, so you listen carefully to the DJ to hear what the name of the song is and whom it is by. When you get home, you log on to your favorite music-downloading site and download the song that you heard earlier in the...
Cost of Free Music Downloading1206 words - 5 pages In 1999, Napster hit the scene with a peer-to-peer file sharing application that changed the world. Within a year, millions of people were trading songs from a simple download. It didn't take long for Metallica to sue Napster and to ban users from access. Napster was forced to shut down in 2001 (Mason). This opened the door; in the next few years, P2P networks and file sharing across the world grew exponentially. The torrent protocol and sites...
Moral Issues of Downloading Music1747 words - 7 pages If it is ok for a starving man to steal food if he has no money, why can?t a person download free music if he or she feels the price is too high? Peer to peer downloading and file sharing is one of the most popular uses of the internet within today?s generation. The downloading and sharing of files takes place in networks such as Limewire, Kazaa, or Edonkey which provide individuals the opportunity to search and download other on a unlimited...
Downloading Free Music from the Internet1595 words - 6 pages Today, one of the most controversial discussion is downloading free music from the Internet. Ever since the Internet got hot from mid 1990s, online music has following the hot wave of the internet. From the earlier au format to the most frequent use format real audio, online music has not cost any problem until the the introduce of the mp3 format. Mp3 stands for MPEG 1 audio layer 3,...
The rights and wrongs for downloading music from the internet for free.872 words - 3 pages Downloading MusicNowadays, most people don't go to music stores to buy CDs anymore. So how are they going to listen to music? You probably have guessed it; they simply go on the Internet and download songs to their computers. It is very true and somewhat...
Music in schools and why it shouldn't be cut.2182 words - 9 pages Music has always been an influential part of human life. From classical music to the playing of musical instruments, its influence on the everyday lives of humans is great. Children of all ages listen to and play music just simply for the nature of it being fun. But music can also be beneficial for a child's development. At an early age children can imitate melodies and rhythms, most of the time without even realizing it. They can even...
Editorial discussing the controversy of downloading music. Gives a quick overview of the history of music downloads and goes into opinions from teens and adults.1421 words - 6 pages Ever since the Internet was created many issues about copyright laws have surfaced. Every form of information has been at risk of being pirated from a computer. Music downloading has had a huge effect on people and generates many opinions and views on the issue. Every 9 out of 10 kids download music and over 2.6 billion songs are downloaded each month. Downloading music has a huge effect on the public and the music industry. To...
The Right to Download Music -persuasive essay to convince it's okay to download music, includes lots of statistics1027 words - 4 pages In September of 2003, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) filed 261 lawsuits against computer users. This was the beginning of the music industry's strike back. For years they said they were losing money due to people such as these, who allegedly infringe on copyright laws by downloading media from the
A dozen years ago a program was created called Napster. It made it easy for ordinary people to download music from their friends and people they had never met. Despite the rock ‘n’ roll ideals of free music for everyone, it changed the music industry forever – some would say for the worse.
Since then, intellectual property rights have been substantially weakened. Unfettered stealing has caused revenues to the recorded music industry to tumble by roughly one third. While this reversal has prompted academic chin-scratching over its cause, most observers now agree that consumers’ ability to steal music undermines firms’ ability to sell it.1 The woes of the recorded music industry, along with fears of the movie, television, and book industries, have led many to advocate stronger legal protections for intellectual property, including private lawsuits, and threats of disconnection from internet service.
While the question of whether stealing undermines selling is of vital interest to the recorded music business, it is arguably not the only important question for evaluating the success of intellectual property rules. The purpose of copyright laws is to provide incentives for the creation of new works. Weakened intellectual property protections present a threat to consumers as well as producers. If producers cannot appropriate sufficient revenue to cover their costs, they may stop bringing new products to market, causing harm to consumers as well as producers. Keeping this in mind focuses attention on a different question. What has happened to the volume – and quality – of new works since Napster?
Three approaches to documenting quality
Documenting the volume of high-quality work is challenging, but in recent work I have developed three approaches to characterising the evolution of music quality over time. The first approach makes use of critics’ retrospective best lists, such as Rolling Stone’s list of the 500 best albums of all time.2 Inclusion of a work on such a list means that it has quality above some time-constant threshold. Each list can be transformed into an index showing the number of listed works originally released in each year. I have 88 such lists from Anglophone sources, together covering the period between 1960 and 2010. These lists’ associated indices can be combined statistically to produce an overall index of music quality. As Figure 1 shows, the index rises from 1960 to 1970, then falls, remaining low during the 1980s. The index rises during the first half of the 1990s, then falls in the second half. Following 2000, the decline stops, and the index is flat. The critic-based index provides no evidence of a decline in recorded music quality since Napster.
The second and third approaches make use of information on the service flow of recorded music, based on sales and radio airplay, by time and vintage.3 For example, I observe the share of music on US radio in 2008 that was originally released in 2008 and each preceding year. I observe the analogous vintage distribution for music aired in each year back to 2004. I also observe coarse data on music sales by year and vintage, so I observe the share of music sold in, say, 2010 that was originally released in 2010 and in each previous year. I observe analogous sales data back to 1970.
In any given year, shares vary across vintage for two reasons. First, music depreciates - music sells less, and is played less on the radio, as it gets older. Second, vintages may differ in their quality. If the quality of music had declined after 2000, then we would expect elevated use of older vintages after 2000, controlling for deprecation. Thus, if I can account for depreciation, the remaining variation in use by original vintage should reflect vintage quality. To this end, I regress the log share of music used in a year t from vintage v on a flexible set of age dummies (to account for depreciation), along with a flexible set of vintage dummies. The coefficients on vintage dummies show the evolution of vintage quality over time.
Results are interesting. The airplay data allow me to infer vintage quality back to 1960 and exhibit the following pattern (in Figure 2) - quality rises from 1960 to 1970, then falls and remains flat from 1980 to about 1999, with a small bump up in the mid-1990s. After 2000, vintage quality rises sharply, reaching levels not seen since the 1970s. The sales data, which produce an index going only back to 1970, suggest a similar story - vintage quality declines from 1970 to 1980, is flat to 2000, then rises after 2000 (see Figure 3).
Two points are in order about these results. First, the three approaches, while independent of one another, produce broadly similar patterns from 1960-2000. Second, none of the three approaches shows a decline in quality following 2000; and two of them – based on actual music usage – show substantial increases.
These results are, at first blush, puzzling – how could the flow of high-quality music continue despite sharp reductions in firms’ ability to appropriate revenue? The puzzle’s resolution may lie in the observation that technological change has not only reduced effective demand; it has also reduced costs of bringing music to market. The costs of creation, promotion, and distribution have all been revolutionised by new information and communications technologies.
While the traditional purveyors of recorded music – the major record labels – have suffered since Napster, good music has continued to make its way to market. Independent labels account for a growing share of successful music, measured both by critical acclaim and sales. While many producers of recorded music have been made worse off by changes in technology, there is no evidence that the volume of high-quality music, or consumers, have suffered. Many caveats are in order, however. Chiefly, it is not clear whether the results extend to other content industries where creation remains quite expensive. But the results are a reminder that an evaluation of copyright policy should be cognisant of its effects on both producers and consumers.
Liebowitz, Stan J (2006), "File Sharing: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?”, Journal of Law and Economics, 49(1), 1-28.
Oberholzer‐Gee, Felix and Koleman Strumpf (2007), “The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Political Economy, 115(1):1–42.
Rob, Rafael and Joel Waldfogel (2006), “Piracy on the High C’s: Music Downloading, Sales Displacement, and Social Welfare in a Sample of College Students”, Journal of Law & Economics, 49(1):29-62.
Waldfogel, Joel (2011a), “Bye, Bye, Miss American Pie: The Supply of New Recorded Music since Napster”, NBER Working Paper 16882.
Waldfogel, Joel (2011b), “Copyright Protection, Technological Change, and the Quality of New Products: Evidence from Recorded Music Since Napster”, NBER Working Paper 17503.
Zentner, Alejandro (2006), “Measuring the Effect of File Sharing on Music Purchases”, The Journal of Law and Economics, 49(1):63–90.
1 Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf (2007) find little or no impact of file sharing on recorded music sales. Most other studies, include Liebowitz (2006 ), Zentner (2006), and Rob and Waldfogel (2006) find a depressing effect of file sharing on legal sales.
2 This approach is described in detail in Waldfogel (2011a).
3 These approaches, along with a summary of the first approach, are described in Waldfogel (2011b).
Topics: Frontiers of economic research
Tags: intellectual property, music